SMCs or electric steels for wind turbines

Soft Magnetic Composites (SMCs) — also called powder cores — consist of insulated iron (or iron-alloy) particles pressed into net-shape components. They replace traditional laminated silicon steel in the stator (and sometimes rotor) cores of wind turbine generators, particularly permanent-magnet(PM) axial-flux direct-drive designs that are popular for low-speed, high-torque operation.

SMCs deliver several clear engineering and economic advantages over laminated steel or coreless designs. These benefits stem from the particle-level insulation, isotropic (3D) magnetic behavior, and powder-metallurgy manufacturing process.

1. Dramatically Lower Eddy-Current Losses and Higher Efficiency

The thin insulating coating between particles creates very high electrical resistivity, suppressing eddy currents far more effectively than laminations (which only limit losses in the plane of the sheets).

This reduces core losses, especially when converter harmonics or PWM switching introduce higher-frequency components.
Result: higher generator efficiency and less waste heat. In comparable low-speed axial-flux PM generators (directly analogous to small/direct-drive wind turbines), SMC-cored designs achieved 87% efficiency versus 81% for coreless equivalents, boosting overall system (water-to-wire or wind-to-wire) efficiency by ~7%.

2. True 3D Flux Paths → Superior Torque Density and Material Utilization

Laminated steel is limited to 2D flux flow. SMCs are isotropic, allowing flux in all directions. Designers can therefore add tooth tips, extended back-irons, and complex stator geometries that:

Reduce flux leakage and tooth-tip saturation
Make better use of copper windings and permanent magnets
Deliver >10% higher torque density (some designs claim up to 4× improvement) for the same volume.

This is especially valuable in axial-flux PM wind generators, where high torque at very low rpm (10–30 rpm for multi-MW turbines) is required without a gearbox.

3. Smaller, Lighter, and More Compact Generators

Higher magnetic saturation (typically ~2.0 T vs. ~1.8 T effective in stacked laminations) plus optimized 3D designs shrink the active material volume.

Weight reductions of ~40–45% have been demonstrated in low-speed axial-flux prototypes (e.g., 6.1 kg SMC vs. 10.9 kg coreless).
Lower nacelle mass reduces tower, foundation, and installation costs — a major advantage for offshore wind turbines.

4. Net-Shape Manufacturing → Lower Cost and Faster Production

Powder pressing eliminates the costly process of stamping, stacking, and welding thousands of laminations.

Complex slotted or claw-pole stators are formed in one step with minimal waste.
In one direct comparison for a low-speed renewable generator, SMC design cut total generator cost by 46% (€147 vs. €273).
the benefits of using soft magnetic composites in wind turbine generator

5. Additional Practical Benefits

Reduced permanent-magnet usage — the improved flux path means fewer or smaller rare-earth magnets are needed.
Better thermal performance — lower losses and more exposed windings improve cooling.
Scalability for variable-speed operation — consistent low-loss behavior across the wide speed range of wind turbines.
Suitable for both small rural turbines and emerging large direct-drive designs where weight and efficiency are critical.
SMCs have slightly lower permeability than the best electrical steels, so they are not always the first choice for ultra-large MW-scale radial-flux generators that still rely on mature lamination technology. However, for axial-flux direct-drive PM wind generators (increasingly favored for gearbox-free reliability), SMC cores consistently show better performance, lower weight, higher efficiency, and lower overall cost than both laminated and coreless alternatives. Prototypes built and tested in the mid-2000s already demonstrated these gains, and ongoing material improvements continue to widen the advantage.
In short, SMCs enable lighter, more efficient, cheaper-to-build, and higher-performing wind turbine generators — exactly the combination needed as the industry pushes toward larger, offshore, and direct-drive machines.
Soft Magnetic Composites (SMCs, also known as powder cores) and traditional laminated silicon steel (electrical steel sheets, often grain-oriented or non-oriented) are the two primary core materials used in wind turbine generators, particularly in permanent magnet synchronous generators (PMSGs) for direct-drive applications.
Laminated steel dominates large-scale commercial wind turbines (both geared and direct-drive), while SMCs are more common in prototypes, axial-flux designs, small-to-medium turbines, and emerging high-performance concepts.
Below is a detailed side-by-side comparison, focusing on key performance aspects relevant to wind turbine generators (low-speed, high-torque, direct-drive PM machines, often axial-flux topology).

Aspect	Laminated Silicon Steel (Traditional)	Soft Magnetic Composites (SMCs)	Winner / Notes for Wind Turbines
Magnetic Flux Path	Anisotropic (primarily 2D, in-plane flux; poor in thickness direction due to lamination orientation)	Isotropic (true 3D flux paths in all directions)	SMC — Enables complex geometries (e.g., tooth tips, claw poles, yokeless designs) and better flux utilization in axial-flux direct-drive generators.
Eddy Current Losses	Moderate to high (limited by thin laminations ~0.3–0.5 mm); increases sharply at higher frequencies or in axial flux where flux cuts lamination planes perpendicularly	Very low (insulated micron-scale particles break current paths)	SMC — Major advantage at converter harmonics, PWM frequencies, or variable-speed operation typical in wind turbines.
Hysteresis Losses	Lower (better soft magnetic properties, higher permeability)	Higher (slightly harder to magnetize)	Laminated steel — But total core losses often favor SMC at >400–1000 Hz.
Total Core Losses	Lower at line frequency (50/60 Hz); higher at elevated frequencies	Higher at low frequency; significantly lower at high frequency (>1 kHz)	SMC for modern variable-speed wind generators with harmonics; laminated steel for very large low-frequency radial-flux machines.
Permeability / Saturation	High permeability (~2000–5000+); saturation ~1.8–2.0 T	Lower permeability (~500–1000); saturation ~1.5–2.0 T (some grades approach steel)	Laminated steel — Requires more material or larger air gap to compensate in SMC designs.
Power / Torque Density	Good, but limited by 2D flux and manufacturing constraints	Higher (often 10–30%+ improvement possible via 3D designs and optimized flux paths)	SMC — Critical for compact, lightweight direct-drive generators (reduces nacelle mass for offshore wind).
Weight & Volume	Heavier and bulkier for same power (especially in axial-flux)	Lighter (up to 40–50% reduction demonstrated in prototypes)	SMC — Lowers tower/foundation costs; key for large offshore turbines.
Manufacturing	Stamping, stacking, welding/insulating thousands of sheets; labor-intensive, high scrap, complex for 3D shapes	Net-shape powder pressing + curing; minimal waste, complex geometries in one step	SMC — Lower production cost and faster for complex stators; laminated steel mature and cheaper at very high volume.
Cost	Lower material cost; high assembly cost for large machines	Higher material cost currently (low volume); lower overall system cost via reduced size/weight/magnets	Context-dependent — SMC often cheaper overall in optimized designs (e.g., 40–50% lower generator cost in some low-speed prototypes).
Thermal Conductivity	Moderate	Better (isotropic + particle structure aids heat dissipation)	SMC — Improves cooling in enclosed nacelle environments.
Mechanical Strength	Excellent (ductile sheets)	Lower (brittle; needs careful handling/design)	Laminated steel — Better for very large MW-scale structures under vibration/wind loads.
Typical Application in Wind	Dominant in commercial radial-flux direct-drive (e.g., Siemens Gamesa, GE) and geared turbines	Prototypes, axial-flux direct-drive, small/medium turbines, pico-hydro analogs; emerging in large concepts with 3D	Laminated steel for proven large-scale; SMC gaining in innovative lightweight/high-efficiency designs.

Laminated silicon steel remains the industry standard for multi-MW direct-drive wind generators due to maturity, high permeability, proven reliability under harsh conditions, and supply chain scale. It excels in radial-flux topologies where flux is mostly 2D.
SMCs shine in axial-flux PM direct-drive generators (increasingly attractive for gearbox elimination and reliability). Their 3D isotropy allows superior torque density, reduced rare-earth magnet usage, lower weight, and better efficiency under variable wind speeds/harmonics. Prototypes show 7–10%+ system efficiency gains and significant cost/weight reductions.
Disadvantages of SMCs include lower permeability (requiring design compensation) and higher cost today, limiting adoption in ultra-large (>10 MW) turbines. Ongoing material improvements (e.g., higher saturation grades) continue to close the gap.

In summary, laminated steel offers reliability and cost-effectiveness at scale today, while SMCs provide a pathway to lighter, more compact, higher-efficiency generators — especially valuable for future offshore and direct-drive wind turbines pushing size and performance limits.

PREV： Why is Soft Magnetic Composite?

NEXT： on-off inefficiency in HVAC system

Back